Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sahota, Sanjeev; Gill, Simon; Ridenton, Jennifer; Hegarty, Helen; Pope, Katherine; Gentile, Giorgio.
  • Sahota S; Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Anaesthetics Brighton and Hove UK.
  • Gill S; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Anaesthetics Truro UK.
  • Ridenton J; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust Cardiology Truro UK.
  • Hegarty H; Sussex Partnership Trust, Department of Psychiatry Eastbourne General Hospital Eastbourne UK.
  • Pope K; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust Paediatrics Truro UK.
  • Gentile G; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust Nephrology Truro UK.
Health Sci Rep ; 4(2): e278, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1222625
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes.

METHODS:

A single site uncontrolled before-after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider implications on doctor's cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing. Outcome measures included change in facial hair between January and April 2020 and whether these changes adhered to guidance set by Public Health England. Participants were also asked about the wider impact of these changes which were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach.

RESULTS:

Of those who completed the survey, 257 participants met the inclusion criteria. 68% (n = 67) of doctors who could grow facial hair changed their facial hairstyle during the COVID-19 pandemic and 96% (n = 64) reported that the change was in response to PPE guidance. The odds of having a facial hairstyle that complied with PPE guidance before the pandemic was 0.32, which rose to 2.77 after guidance was released, giving an odds ratio of 8.54 (95% CI 4.49-16.23, P < .001). When compared to those who sported a shaven face prepandemic, the odds ratio of a change in style for those with prepandemic full beards was 37.92 (95% CI 7.45-192.8, P < .001), for goatees was 7.22 (95% CI 1.076-48.47, P = .04), for moustaches was 4.33 (95% CI 0.207-90.85, P = .345), and for stubble was 9.06 (95% CI 2.133-38.49, P = .003). Qualitative analysis revealed multiple themes, including skin irritation, loss of identity, and a significant impact on participants required to maintain a beard due to religious or cultural reasons.

CONCLUSIONS:

Facial hairstyles have changed significantly at our hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Facial hair can impact upon doctors' cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing and these factors need to be considered with policy and provision of PPE.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article