Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Let It Out (LIO) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study to optimise the design and assess the feasibility of an online emotional disclosure-based intervention in UK hospices.
McInnerney, Daisy; Candy, Bridget; Stone, Patrick; Kupeli, Nuriye.
  • McInnerney D; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK daisy.mcinnerney.18@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Candy B; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
  • Stone P; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
  • Kupeli N; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(5): e047135, 2021 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1225707
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The current COVID-19 pandemic has forced hospices to look for more ways to support people remotely, including psychological support. Emotional disclosure-based interventions hold potential as a way of providing support remotely. However, evidence of their efficacy in people with terminal illness is mixed. Reviews have highlighted this may be due to interventions not being tailored to the unique needs of this population. In response to this, we are developing Let It Out (LIO), an online, self-guided emotional disclosure-based intervention tailored for people living with terminal illness.

AIMS:

The primary objective of the study is to optimise the design of the LIO intervention. Secondary objectives include assessing its acceptability and feasibility; exploring potential impact on well-being; identifying potential adverse effects; and informing choice of outcome measures for potential future evaluation. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

A single arm, mixed-methods, multisite, longitudinal study. Up to 40 people living with a terminal illness under the care of hospices in England and Scotland will receive the online LIO intervention. LIO consists of 3, self-guided expression sessions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome measures are (1) a structured feedback form completed by participants after the final expression session; and (2) semi-structured interviews and focus groups with ≤15 patient participants, ≤30 hospice staff and ≤15 informal carers. These quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated via process evaluation to inform optimisation of the intervention design. Secondary outcome measures include validated measures of physical and psychological health collected at baseline and after the final expression session (immediately, 1, 4 and 8 weeks after); and data on recruitment, retention and fidelity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee (reference 15281/002). The findings will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences, and traditional, online and social media platforms.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Hospices Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-047135

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Hospices Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-047135