Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Radiologists versus Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Comparative Study for Diagnosing COVID-19.
Helwan, Abdulkader; Ma'aitah, Mohammad Khaleel Sallam; Hamdan, Hani; Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun; Tuncyurek, Ozum.
  • Helwan A; Lebanese American University, School of Engineering, Department of ECE, Byblos, Lebanon.
  • Ma'aitah MKS; Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, Mersin-10, 99138, Turkey.
  • Hamdan H; Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, CNRS, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes (L2S UMR CNRS 8506), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
  • Ozsahin DU; Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, Mersin-10, 99138, Turkey.
  • Tuncyurek O; University of Sharjah, College of Health Science, Medical Diagnostic Imaging Department, Sharjah, UAE.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 5527271, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1226786
ABSTRACT
The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is still the routinely used test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). However, according to several reports, RT-PCR showed a low sensitivity and multiple tests may be required to rule out false negative results. Recently, chest computed tomography (CT) has been an efficient tool to diagnose COVID-19 as it is directly affecting the lungs. In this paper, we investigate the application of pre-trained models in diagnosing patients who are positive for COVID-19 and differentiating it from normal patients, who tested negative for coronavirus. The study aims to compare the generalization capabilities of deep learning models with two thoracic radiologists in diagnosing COVID-19 chest CT images. A dataset of 3000 images was obtained from the Near East Hospital, Cyprus, and used to train and to test the three employed pre-trained models. In a test set of 250 images used to evaluate the deep neural networks and the radiologists, it was found that deep networks (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and DenseNet-201) can outperform the radiologists in terms of higher accuracy (97.8%), sensitivity (98.1%), specificity (97.3%), precision (98.4%), and F1-score (198.25%), in classifying COVID-19 images.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Radiologists / Deep Learning / COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2021

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Radiologists / Deep Learning / COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2021