Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Anakinra in hospitalized non-intubated patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Barkas, Fotios; Filippas-Ntekouan, Sebastian; Kosmidou, Maria; Liberopoulos, Evangelos; Liontos, Angelos; Milionis, Haralampos.
  • Barkas F; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Filippas-Ntekouan S; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Kosmidou M; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Liberopoulos E; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Liontos A; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Milionis H; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(12): 5527-5537, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1231045
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome and cytokine release syndrome are the major complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with increased mortality risk. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of anakinra in adult hospitalized non-intubated patients with COVID-19.

METHODS:

Relevant trials were identified by searching literature until 24 April 2021 using the following terms anakinra, IL-1, coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2. Trials evaluating the effect of anakinra on the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality in hospitalized non-intubated patients with COVID-19 were included.

RESULTS:

Nine studies (n = 1119) were eligible for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. Their bias risk with reference to the assessed parameters was high. In pooled analyses, anakinra reduced the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.85, P = 0.02, I2 = 67%; six studies, n = 587) and mortality risk (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23-0.45, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%; nine studies, n = 1119) compared with standard of care therapy. There were no differences regarding the risk of adverse events, including liver dysfunction (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.16, P > 0.05, I2 = 28%; five studies, n = 591) and bacteraemia (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.42-2.73, P > 0.05, I2 = 71%; six studies, n = 727).

CONCLUSIONS:

Available evidence shows that treatment with anakinra reduces both the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality risk of hospitalized non-intubated patients with COVID-19 without increasing the risk of adverse events. Confirmation of efficacy and safety requires randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Receptors, Interleukin-1 / Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Journal subject: Rheumatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Rheumatology

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Receptors, Interleukin-1 / Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Journal subject: Rheumatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Rheumatology