Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology services across the world.
Xu, Y; Mandal, I; Lam, S; Troumpoukis, N; Uberoi, R; Sabharwal, T; Makris, G C.
  • Xu Y; Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.
  • Mandal I; Department of Radiology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, RG1 5AN, UK; UK National Interventional Radiology Trainee Research (UNITE) Collaborative, St Thomas Hospital, SE1 7EH, UK.
  • Lam S; UK National Interventional Radiology Trainee Research (UNITE) Collaborative, St Thomas Hospital, SE1 7EH, UK; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AD, UK.
  • Troumpoukis N; Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Neapoleos 9, Marousi, Athens, Greece; Radiology Department, University Hospital of Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH, UK.
  • Uberoi R; Department of Interventional Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
  • Sabharwal T; Department of Interventional Radiology, Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RS, UK.
  • Makris GC; UK National Interventional Radiology Trainee Research (UNITE) Collaborative, St Thomas Hospital, SE1 7EH, UK; Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Neapoleos 9, Marousi, Athens, Greece; Radiology Department, University Hospital of Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH, UK; Department of Interventional Radiolo
Clin Radiol ; 76(8): 621-625, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1233402
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To review data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology (IR) services. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review of the available studies was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS:

A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. IR caseload reduced between 16.8-80%, with elective activity affected more than emergency work. Trainees also experienced a 11-51.9% reduction in case volumes and many were redeployed to critical care. IR departments re-organised operations and personnel, and many continued to offer 24/7 services and support critical care areas through redeployment of staff. The majority of studies report no significant issues with the availability of personal protective equipment and that local or national governing body or radiology society guidelines were followed.

CONCLUSION:

The COVID-19 pandemic reduced case volumes and training opportunities. IR departments showed flexibility in service delivery. The lessons learned offer novel insights into how services and training can be reorganised to ensure that IR continues to thrive.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Radiology, Interventional / Workload / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.crad.2021.05.001

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Radiology, Interventional / Workload / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.crad.2021.05.001