Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Overview of Bat and Wildlife Coronavirus Surveillance in Africa: A Framework for Global Investigations.
Geldenhuys, Marike; Mortlock, Marinda; Epstein, Jonathan H; Paweska, Janusz T; Weyer, Jacqueline; Markotter, Wanda.
  • Geldenhuys M; Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
  • Mortlock M; Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
  • Epstein JH; Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
  • Paweska JT; EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001, USA.
  • Weyer J; Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
  • Markotter W; Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa.
Viruses ; 13(5)2021 05 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1234835
ABSTRACT
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had devastating health and socio-economic impacts. Human activities, especially at the wildlife interphase, are at the core of forces driving the emergence of new viral agents. Global surveillance activities have identified bats as the natural hosts of diverse coronaviruses, with other domestic and wildlife animal species possibly acting as intermediate or spillover hosts. The African continent is confronted by several factors that challenge prevention and response to novel disease emergences, such as high species diversity, inadequate health systems, and drastic social and ecosystem changes. We reviewed published animal coronavirus surveillance studies conducted in Africa, specifically summarizing surveillance approaches, species numbers tested, and findings. Far more surveillance has been initiated among bat populations than other wildlife and domestic animals, with nearly 26,000 bat individuals tested. Though coronaviruses have been identified from approximately 7% of the total bats tested, surveillance among other animals identified coronaviruses in less than 1%. In addition to a large undescribed diversity, sequences related to four of the seven human coronaviruses have been reported from African bats. The review highlights research gaps and the disparity in surveillance efforts between different animal groups (particularly potential spillover hosts) and concludes with proposed strategies for improved future biosurveillance.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Epidemiological Monitoring Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V13050936

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Epidemiological Monitoring Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V13050936