Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Bottiroli, Maurizio; Calini, Angelo; Pinciroli, Riccardo; Mueller, Ariel; Siragusa, Antonio; Anelli, Carlo; Urman, Richard D; Nozari, Ala; Berra, Lorenzo; Mondino, Michele; Fumagalli, Roberto.
  • Bottiroli M; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.zza Ospedale Maggiore, 3-, 20162, Milan, Italy. maurizio.bottiroli@gmail.com.
  • Calini A; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.zza Ospedale Maggiore, 3-, 20162, Milan, Italy.
  • Pinciroli R; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mueller A; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Siragusa A; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.zza Ospedale Maggiore, 3-, 20162, Milan, Italy.
  • Anelli C; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Urman RD; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.zza Ospedale Maggiore, 3-, 20162, Milan, Italy.
  • Nozari A; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Berra L; Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mondino M; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Fumagalli R; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.zza Ospedale Maggiore, 3-, 20162, Milan, Italy.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 155, 2021 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1238704
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The surge of critically ill patients due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) overwhelmed critical care capacity in areas of northern Italy. Anesthesia machines have been used as alternatives to traditional ICU mechanical ventilators. However, the outcomes for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure cared for with Anesthesia Machines is currently unknow. We hypothesized that COVID-19 patients receiving care with Anesthesia Machines would have worse outcomes compared to standard practice.

METHODS:

We designed a retrospective study of patients admitted with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis at a large tertiary urban hospital in northern Italy. Two care units were included a 27-bed standard ICU and a 15-bed temporary unit emergently opened in an operating room setting. Intubated patients assigned to Anesthesia Machines (AM group) were compared to a control cohort treated with standard mechanical ventilators (ICU-VENT group). Outcomes were assessed at 60-day follow-up. A multivariable Cox regression analysis of risk factors between survivors and non-survivors was conducted to determine the adjusted risk of death for patients assigned to AM group.

RESULTS:

Complete daily data from 89 mechanically ventilated patients consecutively admitted to the two units were analyzed. Seventeen patients were included in the AM group, whereas 72 were in the ICU-VENT group. Disease severity and intensity of treatment were comparable between the two groups. The 60-day mortality was significantly higher in the AM group compared to the ICU-vent group (12/17 vs. 27/72, 70.6% vs. 37.5%, respectively, p = 0.016). Allocation to AM group was associated with a significantly increased risk of death after adjusting for covariates (HR 4.05, 95% CI 1.75-9.33, p = 0.001). Several incidents and complications were reported with Anesthesia Machine care, raising safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results support the hypothesis that care associated with the use of Anesthesia Machines is inadequate to provide long-term critical care to patients with COVID-19. Added safety risks must be considered if no other option is available to treat severely ill patients during the ongoing pandemic. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER Not applicable.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Critical Illness / COVID-19 / Anesthesiology Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12871-021-01376-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Critical Illness / COVID-19 / Anesthesiology Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12871-021-01376-9