Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature.
Acke, Sofie; Couvreur, Simon; Bramer, Wichor M; Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle; De Schryver, Antoon; Haagsma, Juanita A.
  • Acke S; Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  • Couvreur S; Research and Development, Mensura Occupational Health Services, Brussel, Belgium.
  • Bramer WM; Department of Twin Research, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Schmickler MN; Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • De Schryver A; Research and Development, Mensura Occupational Health Services, Brussel, Belgium.
  • Haagsma JA; Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(1): 63-71, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1243722
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Employees in non-healthcare occupations may be in several ways exposed to infectious agents. Improved knowledge about the risks is needed to identify opportunities to prevent work-related infectious diseases. The objective of the current study was to provide an updated overview of the published evidence on the exposure to pathogens among non-healthcare workers. Because of the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, we also aimed to gain more evidence about exposure to several respiratory tract pathogens.

METHODS:

Eligible studies were identified in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane between 2009 and 8 December 2020. The protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019107265). An additional quality assessment was applied according to the Equator network guidelines.

RESULTS:

The systematic literature search yielded 4620 papers of which 270 met the selection and quality criteria. Infectious disease risks were described in 37 occupational groups; 18 of them were not mentioned before. Armed forces (n=36 pathogens), livestock farm labourers (n=31), livestock/dairy producers (n=26), abattoir workers (n=22); animal carers and forestry workers (both n=16) seemed to have the highest risk. In total, 111 pathogen exposures were found. Many of these occupational groups (81.1%) were exposed to respiratory tract pathogens.

CONCLUSION:

Many of these respiratory tract pathogens were readily transmitted where employees congregate (workplace risk factors), while worker risk factors seemed to be of increasing importance. By analysing existing knowledge of these risk factors, identifying new risks and susceptible risk groups, this review aimed to raise awareness of the issue and provide reliable information to establish more effective preventive measures.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Workplace / Disease Transmission, Infectious / Workforce / Occupational Diseases Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Occup Environ Med Journal subject: Occupational Medicine / Environmental Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Oemed-2020-107164

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Workplace / Disease Transmission, Infectious / Workforce / Occupational Diseases Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Occup Environ Med Journal subject: Occupational Medicine / Environmental Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Oemed-2020-107164