Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COVID-19: changing the care process for women's health-the patient's perspective.
Abu-Rustum, Reem S; Bright, Melissa; Moawad, Nash; Weber LeBrun, Emily; Roussos-Ross, Kay; Christman, Gregory; Rhoton-Vlasak, Alice; Smulian, John C.
  • Abu-Rustum RS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Bright M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Moawad N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Weber LeBrun E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Roussos-Ross K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Christman G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Rhoton-Vlasak A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Smulian JC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 6180-6184, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1246625
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Assess women's perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on their health care and well-being, access to and satisfaction with medical care due to the changes in delivery of care triggered by the pandemic.

METHODS:

An online survey of women having health care appointments in the outpatient facilities across all divisions of a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care referral center in North Central Florida. Patients had outpatient appointments that were scheduled, canceled or rescheduled, in person or by telemedicine, between 11 March 2020 and 11 May 2020, a time during which a COVID-19 stay-at-home order was enacted across our state. A total of 6,697 visits were planned. Patients with multiple visits were unified, leaving 6,044 unique patients to whom the survey was emailed between 20 July 2020 and 31 July 2020. The survey was closed on 21 August 2020. Analyses were focused on simple descriptive statistics to assess frequency of responses. Analyses of variance and chi-square analyses were conducted to compare outcomes when all cells were ≥ 10, based on sub-specialty and insurance status; otherwise, frequencies were examined for the entire sample only. Missing data were excluded listwise.

RESULTS:

A total of 6044 patients were contacted. Completed surveys numbered 1,083 yielding a response rate of 17.9%. The most common sub-specialty visit was gynecology (56.7%) followed by obstetrics (31.5%,), pelvic floor disorders (4.8%), gynecological oncology (2.9%,), and reproductive endocrinology (0.5%). A substantial percentage of women had visits canceled (19.2%), rescheduled (32.8%) or changed (42.1%) to telemedicine. In our patient population, 32.6% were worried about visiting the clinic and 48.1% were worried about visiting the hospital. COVID-19 triggered changes were perceived to have a negative impact by 26.1% of respondents. Refusal of future telemedicine visits was by 17.2%, however, 75.2% would prefer to use both in-person and telemedicine visits.

CONCLUSION:

During the initial COVID-19 surge with lockdown, the majority of survey respondents were following public health precautions. However, there were significant concerns amongst women related to obstetric and gynecologic medical appointments scheduled during that period. During pandemics, natural disasters and similar extreme circumstances, digital communication and telemedicine have the potential to play a critical role in providing reassurance and care. Nevertheless, given the concerns expressed by survey respondents, communication and messaging tools are needed to increase comfort and ensure equity with the rapidly changing methods of care delivery.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Journal subject: Obstetrics / Perinatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14767058.2021.1909560

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Journal subject: Obstetrics / Perinatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14767058.2021.1909560