Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prognostic value of three rapid scoring scales and combined predictors for the assessment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
Hu, Hai; Kong, Weili; Yao, Ni; Qiu, Yanru; Yao, Rong.
  • Hu H; International Emergency Medical Team (Sichuan), Emergency Office of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
  • Kong W; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
  • Yao N; Department of Critical Care Medicine, COVID-19 Medical Team (Hubei) of West China Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
  • Qiu Y; Oncology Department of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (East Campus), COVID-19 Ward of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
  • Yao R; International Emergency Medical Team (Sichuan), Emergency Office of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Nurs Open ; 9(3): 1865-1872, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252025
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To explore the factors affecting mortality in patients with COVID-19 and to verify the predictive value of the three rapid scoring scales MEWS, RAPS and REMS.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS:

Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associated with COVID-19-related death. A ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the abilities of the three scoring scales to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS:

Age, low blood oxygen saturation level and decreased lymphocyte count were the high risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality. The analysis of the abilities of the three scales to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 patients The AUC of 0.641 for the RAPS (p = .065). The MEWS (AUC = 0.705, p = .007), compared with RAPS, the NRI was 0.371(p = .03), and the IDI = 0.092 (p = .046); The REMS (AUC = 0.841, p < .001), compared with MEWS, the NRI was 0.227(p = .12), and the IDI=0.09(p = .047); The Combining Predictor (AUC = 0.878, p < .001), compared with REMS, the NRI was 0.25(p = .113), and the IDI=0.02(p = .598).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with an old age, low blood oxygen saturation level and decreased lymphocyte count were at a high risk of COVID-19-related mortality. Moreover, our analysis revealed that the REMS had a better prognostic ability than the MEWS and RAPS when applied to COVID-19 patients. Our findings suggest that the REMS can be used as a rapid scoring tool for the early assessment of COVID-19 severity.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Nurs Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Nurs Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article