Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Upgrades to intensive care: The effects of COVID-19 on decision-making in the emergency department.
Lucas, Nicole V; Rosenbaum, Jennifer; Isenberg, Derek L; Martin, Richard; Schreyer, Kraftin E.
  • Lucas NV; Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street, 10(th) floor Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
  • Rosenbaum J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street, 10(th) floor Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
  • Isenberg DL; Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street, 10(th) floor Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
  • Martin R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street, 10(th) floor Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
  • Schreyer KE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street, 10(th) floor Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States. Electronic address: Kraftin.schreyer@tuhs.temple.edu.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 100-103, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252390
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The initial surge of critically ill patients in the COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted processes at acute care hospitals. This study examines the frequency and causes for patients upgraded to intensive care unit (ICU) level care following admission from the emergency department (ED) to non-critical care units.

METHODS:

The number of ICU upgrades per month was determined, including the percentage of upgrades noted to have non-concordant diagnoses. Charts with non-concordant diagnoses were examined in detail as to the ED medical decision-making, clinical circumstances surrounding the upgrade, and presence of a diagnosis of COVID-19. For each case, a cognitive bias was assigned.

RESULTS:

The percentage of upgraded cases with non-concordant diagnoses increased from a baseline range of 14-20% to 41.3%. The majority of upgrades were due to premature closure (72.2%), anchoring (61.1%), and confirmation bias (55.6%).

CONCLUSION:

Consistent with the behavioral literature, this suggests that stressful ambient conditions affect cognitive reasoning processes.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making, Organizational / Surge Capacity / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ajem.2021.05.078

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making, Organizational / Surge Capacity / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ajem.2021.05.078