Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The reliability of saliva for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: Insights on the diagnostic performance and utility for COVID-19 screening.
Alkhateeb, Khaled J; Cahill, Meredith N; Ross, Adam S; Arnold, Forest W; Snyder, James W.
  • Alkhateeb KJ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: kjkhateeb@gmail.com.
  • Cahill MN; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Center of Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Ross AS; Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Arnold FW; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Center of Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Snyder JW; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: jwsnyd01@louisville.edu.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(3): 115450, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252667
ABSTRACT
Current literature has focused on testing saliva in symptomatic patients, and little information is available regarding saliva performance in asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We compared paired saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) collected from 33 symptomatic and 12 asymptomatic known SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Saliva had an overall sensitivity of 59%, a specificity of 95%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. Saliva demonstrated higher sensitivity in symptomatic (80%) vs. asymptomatic individuals (36%) (P = 0.006), and in high-risk (symptomatic, febrile and/or with comorbidities) (82%) vs. low-risk (asymptomatic, afebrile, and no comorbidities) (22%) patients (P = 0.0002). Cycle threshold (Ct) values in NPS specimens were higher in saliva-negative vs. saliva-positive cases (P = 0.02 and <0.001). Overall, these findings show that despite saliva's low sensitivity in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, it can detect infections with lower Ct values and a potentially higher chance of viral transmission. Additional studies are warranted to fully evaluate saliva as a screening test for coronavirus disease-2019.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2021 Document Type: Article