Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Greenberg, Rachel G; Poole, Lori; Ford, Daniel E; Hanley, Daniel; Selker, Harry P; Lane, Karen; Dean, J Michael; Burr, Jeri; Harris, Paul; Wilkins, Consuelo H; Bernard, Gordon; Edwards, Terri; Benjamin, Daniel K.
  • Greenberg RG; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Poole L; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Ford DE; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Hanley D; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Selker HP; Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Lane K; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Dean JM; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Burr J; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Harris P; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Wilkins CH; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Bernard G; Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Edwards T; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Benjamin DK; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 5(1): e100, 2021 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1253823
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond to the pandemic.

METHODS:

The TIN's three Trial Innovation Centers, Recruitment Innovation Center, and 66 Clinical and Translational Science Award Hub institutions, collaborated to adapt to the pandemic's rapidly changing landscape, playing central roles in the planning and execution of pivotal studies addressing COVID-19. Our objective was to summarize the results of these collaborations and lessons learned.

RESULTS:

The TIN provided 29 COVID-related consults between March 2020 and December 2020, including 6 trial participation expressions of interest and 8 community engagement studios from the Recruitment Innovation Center. Key lessons learned from these experiences include the benefits of leveraging an established infrastructure, innovations surrounding remote research activities, data harmonization and central safety reviews, and early community engagement and involvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our experience highlighted the benefits and challenges of a multi-institutional approach to clinical research during a pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cts.2021.782

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cts.2021.782