Your browser doesn't support javascript.
PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Breast Cancers.
Kikano, Elias George; Avril, Stefanie; Marshall, Holly; Jones, Robert Stanley; Montero, Alberto J; Avril, Norbert.
  • Kikano EG; Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Avril S; Department of Pathology, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Marshall H; Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Jones RS; Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Montero AJ; Department of Medicine, Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Avril N; Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: norbert.avril@case.edu.
Semin Nucl Med ; 51(5): 474-484, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1254012
ABSTRACT
There are a number of normal variants and pitfalls which are important to consider when evaluating F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in breast cancer patients. Although FDG-PET is not indicated for the initial diagnosis of breast cancer, focally increased glucose metabolism within breast tissue represents a high likelihood for a neoplastic process and requires further evaluation. Focally increased glucose metabolism is not unique to breast cancer. Other malignancies such as lymphoma, metastases from solid tumors as well as inflammatory changes also may demonstrate increased glucose metabolism either within the breast or at other sites throughout the body. Importantly, benign breast disease may also exhibit increased glucose metabolism, limiting the specificity of FDG-PET. Breast cancer has a wide range of metabolic activity attributed to tumor heterogeneity and breast cancer subtype. Intracellular signaling pathways regulating tumor glucose utilization contribute to these pitfalls of PET/CT in breast cancer. The evaluation of axillary lymph nodes by FDG-PET is less accurate than sentinel lymph node procedure, however is very accurate in identifying level II and III axillary lymph node metastases or retropectoral metastases. It is important to note that non-malignant inflammation in lymph nodes are often detected by modern PET/CT technology. Therefore, particular consideration should be given to recent vaccinations, particularly to COVID-19, which can commonly result in increased metabolic activity of axillary nodes. Whole body FDG-PET for staging of breast cancer requires specific attention to physiologic variants of FDG distribution and a careful comparison with co-registered anatomical imaging. The most important pitfalls are related to inflammatory changes including sarcoidosis, sarcoid like reactions, and other granulomatous diseases as well as secondary neoplastic processes.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Semin Nucl Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Semin Nucl Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article