Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2.
Martin, Alex F; Denford, Sarah; Love, Nicola; Ready, Derren; Oliver, Isabel; Amlôt, Richard; Rubin, G James; Yardley, Lucy.
  • Martin AF; Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London, London, UK. alex.martin@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Denford S; Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. alex.martin@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Love N; Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Ready D; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Oliver I; School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Amlôt R; National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
  • Rubin GJ; Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Yardley L; National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1067, 2021 06 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1255927
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In December 2020, Public Health England with NHS Test and Trace initiated a pilot study in which close contacts of people with confirmed COVID-19 were given the option to carryout lateral flow device antigen tests at home, as an alternative to self-isolation for 10-14 days. In this study, we evaluated engagement with daily testing, and assessed levels of adherence to the rules relating to behaviour following positive or negative test results.

METHODS:

We conducted a service evaluation of the pilot study, examining survey responses from a subset of those who responded to an evaluation questionnaire. We used an online cross-sectional survey offered to adult contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases who consented to daily testing. We used a comparison group of contacts who were not offered testing and instead self-isolated.

RESULTS:

Acceptability of daily testing was lower among survey respondents who were not offered the option of testing and among people from ethnic minority groups. Overall, 52% of respondents reported being more likely to share details of people that they had been in contact with following a positive test result, if they knew that their contacts would be offered the option of daily testing. Only 2% reported that they would be less likely to provide details of their contacts. On the days that they were trying to self-isolate, 19% of participants reported that they left the house, with no significant group differences. Following a negative test, 13% of respondents reported that they increased their contacts, but most (58%) reported having fewer risky contacts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data suggest that daily testing is potentially acceptable, may facilitate sharing contact details of close contacts among those who test positive for COVID-19, and promote adherence to self-isolation. A better understanding is needed of how to make this option more acceptable for all households. The impact of receiving a negative test on behaviour remains a risk that needs to be monitored and mitigated by appropriate messaging. Future research should examine attitudes and behaviour in a context where infection levels are lower, testing is more familiar, and restrictions on activity have been reduced.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-11135-7

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-11135-7