Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Besançon, Lonni; Peiffer-Smadja, Nathan; Segalas, Corentin; Jiang, Haiting; Masuzzo, Paola; Smout, Cooper; Billy, Eric; Deforet, Maxime; Leyrat, Clémence.
  • Besançon L; Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. lonni.besancon@gmail.com.
  • Peiffer-Smadja N; Media and Information Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. lonni.besancon@gmail.com.
  • Segalas C; Université de Paris, IAME, INSERM, Paris, F-75018, France.
  • Jiang H; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Masuzzo P; Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Smout C; School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Billy E; IGDORE, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education, Box 1074, Kristinehöjdsgatan 9A, Gothenburg, 412 82, Sweden.
  • Deforet M; IGDORE, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education, Box 1074, Kristinehöjdsgatan 9A, Gothenburg, 412 82, Sweden.
  • Leyrat C; , Strasbourg, France.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 21(1): 117, 2021 06 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259185
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT
In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https//osf.io/renxy/ .
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12874-021-01304-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12874-021-01304-y