Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Stress among Frontline Medical Personnel in Daegu City, Korea.
Shin, Su-Jeong; Kim, Yun-Jeong; Ryoo, Hyun-Wook; Moon, Sungbae; Lee, Sang-Hun; Moon, You-Ho; Jang, Tae-Chang; Park, Dong-Chan.
  • Shin SJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu 42415, Korea.
  • Kim YJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.
  • Ryoo HW; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.
  • Moon S; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea.
  • Moon YH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, Korea.
  • Jang TC; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu 42472, Korea.
  • Park DC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu 41199, Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(6)2021 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259542
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Frontline medical staff usually experience high levels of stress, which could greatly impact their work output. We conducted a survey to investigate the level of stress and its association with job types, work departments, and medical centers among COVID-19 pandemic frontline medical personnel. Materials and

Methods:

We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire among 307 frontline medical staff who cared for COVID-19 patients in Daegu city. We used a 33-item questionnaire to assess respondents' general characteristics, job stress, personal effects associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and their stress level. A general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) was included in our questionnaire.

Results:

Majority (74.3%) of the respondents were in the stress group. The mean GHQ-12 score was 14.31 ± 4.96. More females (67.4%, p < 0.05) and nurses (73.3%, p = 0.001) were in the stress group compared to males and doctors. Medical staff in the general ward considered the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic situation higher. Nurses perceived work changes (p < 0.05), work burden (p < 0.05), and personal impact (p < 0.05) more serious than doctors. Medical staff in Level 3 emergency department (ED) perceived a lack of real-time information (p = 0.012), a lack of resources, and negative personal impacts associated with the pandemic as more serious than staff in Level 1 and Level 2 EDs. Medical staff in the intensive care unit perceived work changes (p < 0.05), work burden (p < 0.05), and lack of personal protective equipment (p = 0.002) as more serious than staff in the ED and general ward.

Conclusion:

Providing real-time information and resources for reducing work burden and negative personal impact is central to maximizing the work output of the COVID-19 pandemic frontline medical staff. Supporting their mental health through regular programs and intervention is also imperative.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article