Your browser doesn't support javascript.
From telehealth to virtual primary care in Australia? A Rapid scoping review.
Jonnagaddala, Jitendra; Godinho, Myron Anthony; Liaw, Siaw-Teng.
  • Jonnagaddala J; WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: z3339253@unsw.edu.au.
  • Godinho MA; WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia.
  • Liaw ST; WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Siaw@unsw.edu.au.
Int J Med Inform ; 151: 104470, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1263285
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The COVID-19 pandemic and its socio-economic impacts have disrupted our health systems and society. We sought to examine informatics and digital health strategies that supported the primary care response to COVID-19 in Australia. Specifically, the review aims to answer how Australian primary health care responded and adapted to COVID-19, the facilitators and inhibitors of the Primary care informatics and digital health enabled COVID-19 response and virtual models of care observed in Australia.

METHODS:

We conducted a rapid scoping review complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search, data extraction, and synthesis of the included studies. Any disagreement in the eligibility screening, data extraction or synthesis was resolved through consensus meeting and if required. was referred to a third reviewer. Evidence was synthesised, summarised, and mapped to several themes that answer the research question s of this review.

RESULTS:

We identified 377 papers from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Following title, abstract and full-text screening, 29 eligible papers were included. The majority were "perspectives" papers. The dearth of original research into digital health and COVID-19 in primary care meant limited evidence on effectiveness, access, equity, utility, safety, and quality. Data extraction and evidence synthesis identified 14 themes corresponding to 3 research questions. Telehealth was the key digital health response in primary care, together with mobile applications and national hotlines, to enable the delivery of virtual primary care and support public health. Enablers and barriers such as workforce training, digital resources, patient experience and ethical issues, and business model and management issues were identified as important in the evolution of virtual primary care.

CONCLUSIONS:

COVID-19 has transformed Australian primary care with the rapid adaptation of digital technologies to complement "in-person" primary care with telehealth and virtual models of care. The pandemic has also highlighted several literacy, maturity/readiness, and micro, meso and macro-organisational challenges with adopting and adapting telehealth to support integrated person-centred health care. There is a need for more research into how telehealth and virtual models of care can improve the access, integration, safety, and quality of virtual primary care.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Int J Med Inform Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Int J Med Inform Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article