Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) exposure in pet cats and dogs in Minnesota, USA.
Dileepan, Mythili; Di, Da; Huang, Qinfeng; Ahmed, Shamim; Heinrich, Daniel; Ly, Hinh; Liang, Yuying.
  • Dileepan M; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Di D; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Huang Q; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Ahmed S; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Heinrich D; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Ly H; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
  • Liang Y; Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
Virulence ; 12(1): 1597-1609, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1268053
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is continuing to spread globally. SARS-CoV-2 infections of feline and canine species have also been reported. However, it is not entirely clear to what extent natural SARS-CoV-2 infection of pet dogs and cats is in households. We have developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein and the receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of the spike protein, and the SARS-CoV-2 spike-pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based neutralization assay to screen serum samples of 239 pet cats and 510 pet dogs in Minnesota in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic from mid-April to early June 2020 for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 exposures. A cutoff value was used to identify the seropositive samples in each experiment. The average seroprevalence of N- and RBD-specific antibodies in pet cats were 8% and 3%, respectively. Among nineteen (19) N-seropositive cat sera, fifteen (15) exhibited neutralizing activity and seven (7) were also RBD-seropositive. The N-based ELISA is also specific and does not cross react with antigens of common feline coronaviruses. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected at a very low percentage in pet dogs (~ 1%) and were limited to IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 N protein with no neutralizing activities. Our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 seropositive rates are higher in pet cats than in pet dogs in MN early in the pandemic and that SARS-CoV-2 N-specific IgG antibodies can detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in companion animals with higher levels of specificity and sensitivity than RBD-specific IgG antibodies in ELISA-based assays.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pets / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Virulence Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 21505594.2021.1936433

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pets / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Virulence Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 21505594.2021.1936433