Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States.
Liu, Taoran; He, Zonglin; Huang, Jian; Yan, Ni; Chen, Qian; Huang, Fengqiu; Zhang, Yuejia; Akinwunmi, Omolola M; Akinwunmi, Babatunde O; Zhang, Casper J P; Wu, Yibo; Ming, Wai-Kit.
  • Liu T; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • He Z; International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • Huang J; Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138632, Singapore.
  • Yan N; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
  • Chen Q; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • Huang F; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • Akinwunmi OM; School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • Akinwunmi BO; Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Zhang CJP; Department of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Wu Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Ming WK; Center for Genomic Medicine (CGM), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(6)2021 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1270134
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.).

METHOD:

A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experiments, as well as Likert scales, were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to vaccination acceptance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries.

RESULTS:

A total of 9077 (5375 and 3702 from China and the United States, respectively) respondents completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% of respondents from China positively accepted the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% of respondents from the United States positively accepted it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the U.S. respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the United States attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint, that the cost of vaccination covered the largest proportion in their trade-off (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Additionally, respondents from China tended to be much more concerned about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs. 6.12%) and have a lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19.

CONCLUSION:

Although the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between these countries were observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in the two countries, vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vaccines9060649

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vaccines9060649