Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Eosinopenia <100/µL as a marker of active COVID-19: An observational prospective study.
Outh, Roderau; Boutin, Caroline; Gueudet, Philippe; Suzuki, Marcelino; Saada, Matthieu; Aumaître, Hugues.
  • Outh R; Service de Médecine Interne et Générale, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France. Electronic address: roderau.outh@ch-perpignan.fr.
  • Boutin C; Service de Médecine Interne et Générale, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
  • Gueudet P; Service de Biologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
  • Suzuki M; Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Biotechnologies Microbiennes, USR3579, Observatoire Océanologique, 66650, Banyuls-sur-mer, France.
  • Saada M; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
  • Aumaître H; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 54(1): 61-68, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1272575
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To analyse the diagnostic performance of eosinopenia, alone or combined with polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and/or lymphocytes, as a marker of active COVID-19 in patients hospitalized for suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS:

A prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for suspicion of COVID-19 in a COVID unit was performed from 20th March to 5th April 2020, in Perpignan, France. Patients for which there was a doubt upon diagnosis, who were recently under oral corticosteroids, had myeloid malignancy or human immunodeficient virus infection were excluded. SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed using an RT-PCR assay, from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Complete blood count were performed for all patients.

RESULTS:

One-hundred and twenty-one patient were included 57 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 64 patients were not. Eosinophil count was lower in the COVID-19 group (median 0/µL versus 70/µL, p < 0.0001). To diagnose COVID-19, eosinopenia had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 78.1% while lymphopenia's were 73.7% and 62.5% respectively. Using area under curve (AUC) of receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves, eosinophil's optimal cut-off level was 10/µL, sensitivity and specificity were 86%, and 79.7% respectively. Regarding the eosinophil/PMN ratio, the optimal cut-off level was 3.344, sensitivity and specificity were 87.7% and 73.4% respectively. The AUC of lymphocyte/PMN ratio was significantly lower than eosinophil/PMN ratio's (0.621 versus 0.846, p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION:

Eosinopenia - <10/µL - and eosinophil/PMN ratio are useful, low-cost, reproducible tools to help diagnose COVID-19, during an epidemic period, in a population of hospitalized patients admitted for suspicion of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Eosinophils / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Microbiol Immunol Infect Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology / Microbiology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Eosinophils / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Microbiol Immunol Infect Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology / Microbiology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article