Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparing Ventilation Parameters for COVID-19 Patients Using Both Long-Term ICU and Anesthetic Ventilators in Times of Shortage.
Dijkman, Wouter M; van Acht, Niels M C; van Akkeren, Jesse P; Bhagwanbali, Rhasna C D; van Pul, Carola.
  • Dijkman WM; Department of Intensive Care, 8185Máxima Medical Center (MMC), Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
  • van Acht NMC; Department of Applied Physics, 3169Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • van Akkeren JP; Department of Clinical Physics, 571115Máxima Medical Center (MMC), Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Bhagwanbali RCD; Department of Intensive Care, 8185Máxima Medical Center (MMC), Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
  • van Pul C; Department of Anesthesiology, 8185Máxima Medical Center (MMC), Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(8): 963-971, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273202
ABSTRACT
In the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, many patients were treated in hospitals using mechanical ventilation. However, due to a shortage of ICU ventilators, hospitals worldwide needed to deploy anesthesia machines for ICU ventilation (which is off-label use). A joint guidance was written to apply anesthesia machines for long-term ventilation. The goal of this research is to retrospectively evaluate the differences in measurable ventilation parameters between the ICU ventilator and the anesthesia machine as used for COVID-19 patients. In this study, we included 32 patients treated in March and April 2020, who had more than 3 days of mechanical ventilation, either in the regular ICU with ICU ventilators (Hamilton S1), or in the temporary emergency ICU with anesthetic ventilators (Aisys, GE). The data acquired during regular clinical treatment was collected from the Patient Data Management Systems. Available ventilation parameters (pressures and volumes PEEP, Ppeak, Pinsp, Vtidal), monitored parameters EtCO2, SpO2, derived compliance C, and resistance R were processed and analyzed. A sub-analysis was performed to compare closed-loop ventilation (INTELLiVENT-ASV) to other ventilation modes. The results showed no major differences in the compared parameters, except for Pinsp. PEEP was reduced over time in the with Hamilton treated patients. This is most likely attributed to changing clinical protocol as more clinical experience and literature became available. A comparison of compliance between the 2 ventilators could not be made due to variances in the measurement of compliance. Closed loop ventilation could be used in 79% of the time, resulting in more stable EtCO2. From the analysis it can be concluded that the off-label usage of the anesthetic ventilator in our hospital did not result in differences in ventilation parameters compared to the ICU treatment in the first 4 days of ventilation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Ventilators, Mechanical / COVID-19 / Anesthesiology Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08850666211024911

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Ventilators, Mechanical / COVID-19 / Anesthesiology Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08850666211024911