Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Crivellaro, Priscila; Tafur, Monica; George, Ralph; Muradali, Derek.
  • Crivellaro P; Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
  • Tafur M; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1W7, Canada.
  • George R; Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada.
  • Muradali D; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1W7, Canada.
Eur Radiol ; 32(1): 613-620, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1274819
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a temporary cessation of mammography screening. However, in some facilities, diagnostic breast imaging services continued for patients with a high clinical suspicion of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in the diagnostic interval (DI) of non-screening patients presenting for diagnostic mammography during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

Retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting for non-screening diagnostic mammography from April 1 to June 30, 2020 (pandemic group) and April 1 to June 30, 2019 (pre-pandemic group). Age, reason for referral, number and type of imaging studies/biopsies necessary for a final diagnosis were recorded. Diagnostic interval (DI) was defined as the number of days from the date of the diagnostic mammogram to the date of the final diagnosis.

RESULTS:

Compared to the pre-pandemic group (n = 64), the pandemic group (n = 77) showed a reduction in DI of the entire cohort (pandemic 1 day; pre-pandemic 15 days, p < 0.0001) for patients not requiring tissue sampling (pandemic 1 day; pre-pandemic 11 days, .p < 0.0001) and those requiring tissue sampling with benign pathology (pandemic 9 days; pre-pandemic, 33 days, p = 0.0002). A higher percentage of patients in the pandemic group had their assessment completed during the initial visit (pandemic 50.6%; pre-pandemic 23.4%, p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION:

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the DI for patients with non-screening-related diagnostic mammography was significantly shorter, with a higher percentage of patients completing their assessments on the initial visit, compared to one year prior. KEY POINTS • Despite reductions in manpower and clinical services, during pandemic times, it is possible to maintain a diagnostic breast imaging service for women at high clinical suspicion for breast cancer. • During pandemic times, breast imaging departments should consider restructuring to a Rapid Diagnostic Unit model with a navigation team that follows patients through the assessment process to a final diagnosis. • Departmental restructuring and patient navigation during pandemic times could either maintain or shorten the diagnostic interval for patients presenting for diagnostic mammography.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00330-021-08117-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00330-021-08117-z