Your browser doesn't support javascript.
[Impact of family restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic on the use of physical restraint in an acute hospital: An observational study]. / Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la utilización de la contención mecánica en un hospital de agudos: estudio observacional.
Font, R; Quintana, S; Monistrol, O.
  • Font R; Área de Desarrollo de Enfermería, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: rfont@mutuaterrassa.cat.
  • Quintana S; Unidad de Críticos y Semicríticos, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España.
  • Monistrol O; Área de Desarrollo de Enfermería, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 36(5): 263-268, 2021.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1712800
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

During the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, hospitals developed contingency plans that transformed and reorganized the hospital activity. One of the measures was to restrict access to family members of hospitalized patients. The presence of the patient's family is considered an alternative to physical restraint. The aim of this study is to compare the use of physical restraint in hospitalized patients in an acute care hospital during the previous period of the pandemic of COVID-19 with the post-confinement period with hospitals being still closed to family. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We made an observational study that compares the prevalence of physical restraint in an acute care hospital during the previous period to the alarm state (February 2020) with the second period, when visits where restricted (May 2020). From the clinical history of the patients with physical restraint we collected the following variables sex, diagnostic, hospital admission unit, reason for using physical restraint, localization, length, type of material, registration in the medical record, information given to the family, alternatives to the physical restraint and injuries related to the physical restraint.

RESULTS:

We evaluated 690 patients 388 during the previous period and 320 during the second period. From all patients, 29 needed physical restraint. The use of physical restraint went from 8 (2%) to 21 (7%) (p=0.003). In the second period, a not statistically significant increase in continuous physical restraint was identified compared to the first period.

CONCLUSIONS:

The physical restraint prevalence has been superior during the second period in which families were not present with the hospitalized patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Visitors to Patients / Restraint, Physical / Family / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: Spanish Journal: J Healthc Qual Res Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Visitors to Patients / Restraint, Physical / Family / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: Spanish Journal: J Healthc Qual Res Year: 2021 Document Type: Article