Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Patient and Provider Experience with Telemedicine in a Urology Practice: Identifying Opportunities for Improvement.
Cohen, Tara N; Choi, Eunice; Kanji, Falisha F; Scott, Victoria C S; Eilber, Karyn S; Anger, Jennifer T.
  • Cohen TN; Human Factors Research Scientist, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, California.
  • Choi E; Research Assistant, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kanji FF; Research Assistant, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, California.
  • Scott VCS; Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery,Cedars-Sinai Health System, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Los Angeles, California.
  • Eilber KS; Associate Professor Urology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Associate Program Director, Urology Residency Training Program, Co-Director, FPMRS Fellowship Training Program, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Los Angeles, California.
  • Anger JT; Adjunct Assistant Professor of Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Urol Pract ; 8(3): 328-336, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1276297
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

As a result of COVID-19, several clinics have adopted telemedicine to safely deliver care. However, the introduction of a new technology into an already complex system creates new challenges that have the potential to negatively impact patient and provider experience. We aimed to use a human factors approach (the science concerned with understanding the interactions between humans and other elements in a complex system) to identify where systemic vulnerabilities may exist throughout the patient/provider experience with telemedicine.

METHODS:

A total of 23 patients scheduled for telemedicine consults were observed during visits with providers. A trained human factors observer documented disruptions to system efficiency (eg communication breakdowns, connectivity problems and interruptions) and invited patients and providers to take a survey investigating perceptions of telemedicine technology usability, satisfaction with the experience and opportunities to improve the process.

RESULTS:

Visits lasted an average of 17 minutes, 20 seconds and each visit had an average of 6 disruptions. Inefficiencies were categorized into 13 categories consisting mainly of interruptions (21, 15.22%), Internet connectivity issues (21, 15.22%), nonoptimal device setup (19, 13.77%) and repeat communication (18, 13.04%). Provider satisfaction with the system was 3.72/5.00 and perceived usability was 63.15 (68 is considered acceptable). Patient satisfaction was 4.80/5.00 and perceived usability was 85.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings highlight opportunities for a multifaceted intervention, including the development of an informational sheet/video for patients, a telemedicine "best practices" guideline for physicians, a standardized training process and checklist for front office staff and an in-service training for the entire care team.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Language: English Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Language: English Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article