Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Healthcare workers as a sentinel surveillance population in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Venkatachalam, Indumathi; Conceicao, Edwin Philip; Aung, May Kyawt; Bien How, Molly Kue; Wee, Liang En; Ying Sim, Jean Xiang; Tan, Ban Hock; Ling, Moi Lin.
  • Venkatachalam I; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology; Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Conceicao EP; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Aung MK; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Bien How MK; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Wee LE; SingHealth Infectious Diseases Residency Programme, SingHealth, Singapore.
  • Ying Sim JX; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology; Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Tan BH; Department of Clinical Quality and Performance Management, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Ling ML; Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore Med J ; 63(10): 577-584, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1280945
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a critical resource in the effort to control the COVID-19 pandemic. They are also a sentinel surveillance population whose clinical status reflects the effectiveness of the hospital's infection prevention measures in the pandemic.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Singapore General Hospital (SGH), a 1,822-bed tertiary hospital. Participants were all HCWs working in SGH during the study period. HCW protection measures included clinical workflows and personal protective equipment developed and adapted to minimise the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. HCW monitoring comprised staff contact logs in high-risk locations, twice-daily temperature monitoring, assessment of HCWs with acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) in the staff clinic and, in the event of an exposure, extensive contact tracing, detailed risk assessment and risk-based interventions. HCW surveillance utilised monitoring data and ARI presentations and outcomes.

Results:

In the ten-week period between 6 January 2020 and 16 March 2020, 333 (17.1%) of 1,946 HCWs at risk of occupational COVID-19 presented with ARI. 32 (9.6%) screened negative for SARS-CoV-2 from throat swabs. Five other HCWs developed COVID-19 attributed to non-clinical exposures. From the nine COVID-19 exposure episodes investigated, 189 HCW contacts were identified, of whom 68 (36.2%) were placed on quarantine and remained well.

Conclusion:

Early in an emerging infectious disease outbreak, close monitoring of frontline HCWs is essential in ascertaining the effectiveness of infection prevention measures. HCWs are at risk of community disease acquisition and should be monitored and managed to prevent onward transmission.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Singapore Med J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Smedj.2021083

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Singapore Med J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Smedj.2021083