Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Logistic advantage of two-step screening strategy for SARS-CoV-2 at airport quarantine.
Yokota, Isao; Shane, Peter Y; Teshima, Takanori.
  • Yokota I; Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. Electronic address: yokotai@pop.med.hokudai.ac.jp.
  • Shane PY; International Medical Department, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Teshima T; International Medical Department, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Division of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. Electronic address: teshima@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 43: 102127, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1281580
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Airport quarantine is required to reduce the risk of entry of travelers infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is challenging for both high accuracy and rapid turn-around time to coexist in testing; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is time-consuming with high accuracy, while antigen testing is rapid with less accuracy. However, there are few data on the concordance between PCR and antigen testing.

METHODS:

Arrivals at three international airports in Japan between July 29 and September 30, 2020 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using self-collected saliva by a screening strategy with initial chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) followed by confirmatory nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) only for intermediate range antigen concentrations.

RESULTS:

Among the 95,457 persons entering Japan during the period, 88,924 (93.2%) were tested by CLEIA, and 0.29% (254/88,924) were found to be SARS-CoV-2 antigen positive (≥4.0 pg/mL). NAAT was required for confirmatory testing in 0.58% (513/88,924) with intermediate antigen concentrations (0.67-4.0 pg/mL) whereby the virus was detected in 6.6% (34/513). This two-step strategy reduced the utilization of NAAT to one out of every 173 test subjects. The estimated performance of this strategy did not show significant increase in false negatives as compared to performing NAAT in all subjects.

CONCLUSIONS:

Point of care testing by quantitative CLEIA using self-collected saliva is less labor-intensive and yields results rapidly, thus suitable as an initial screening test. Reserving NAAT for CLEIA indeterminate cases may prevent compromising accuracy while significantly improving the logistics of administering mass-screening at large venues.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Travel Med Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Travel Med Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article