Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Interventions to increase personal protective behaviours to limit the spread of respiratory viruses: A rapid evidence review and meta-analysis.
Perski, Olga; Szinay, Dorothy; Corker, Elizabeth; Shahab, Lion; West, Robert; Michie, Susan.
  • Perski O; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
  • Szinay D; Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Corker E; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
  • Shahab L; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
  • West R; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
  • Michie S; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
Br J Health Psychol ; 27(1): 215-264, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1281980
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Increasing personal protective behaviours is critical for stopping the spread of respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 We need evidence to inform how to achieve this. We aimed to synthesize evidence on interventions to increase six personal protective behaviours (e.g., hand hygiene, face mask use, maintaining physical distancing) to limit the spread of respiratory viruses.

METHODS:

We used best practice for rapid evidence reviews. We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies conducted in adults or children with active or passive comparators were included. We extracted data on study design, intervention content, mode of delivery, population, setting, mechanism(s) of action, acceptability, practicability, effectiveness, affordability, spill-over effects, and equity impact. Study quality was assessed with Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

We identified 39 studies conducted across 15 countries. Interventions targeted hand hygiene (n = 30) and/or face mask use (n = 12) and used two- or three-arm study designs with passive comparators. Interventions were typically delivered face-to-face and included a median of three behaviour change techniques. The quality of included studies was low. Interventions to increase hand hygiene (k = 6) had a medium, positive effect (d = .62, 95% CI = 0.43-0.80, p < .001, I2 = 81.2%). Interventions targeting face mask use (k = 4) had mixed results, with an imprecise pooled estimate (OR = 4.14, 95% CI = 1.24-13.79, p < .001, I2 = 89.67%). Between-study heterogeneity was high.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found low-quality evidence for positive effects of interventions targeting hand hygiene, with unclear results for interventions targeting face mask use. There was a lack of evidence for most behaviours of interest within this review.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Br J Health Psychol Journal subject: Psychology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bjhp.12542

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Br J Health Psychol Journal subject: Psychology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bjhp.12542