Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care.
Adel, Samar; Zaher, Abbas; El Harouni, Nadia; Venugopal, Adith; Premjani, Pratik; Vaid, Nikhilesh.
  • Adel S; Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Zaher A; Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • El Harouni N; Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Venugopal A; Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
  • Premjani P; Department of Orthodontics, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Vaid N; Swami Vivekananda Subharati University, Meerut, India.
Biomed Res Int ; 2021: 9954615, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1285105
ABSTRACT
The last decade (2010-2021) has witnessed the evolution of robotic applications in orthodontics. This review scopes and analyzes published orthodontic literature in eight different domains (1) robotic dental assistants; (2) robotics in diagnosis and simulation of orthodontic problems; (3) robotics in orthodontic patient education, teaching, and training; (4) wire bending and customized appliance robotics; (5) nanorobots/microrobots for acceleration of tooth movement and for remote monitoring; (6) robotics in maxillofacial surgeries and implant placement; (7) automated aligner production robotics; and (8) TMD rehabilitative robotics. A total of 1,150 records were searched, of which 124 potentially relevant articles were retrieved in full. 87 studies met the selection criteria following screening and were included in the scoping review. The review found that studies pertaining to arch wire bending and customized appliance robots, simulative robots for diagnosis, and surgical robots have been important areas of research in the last decade (32%, 22%, and 16%). Rehabilitative robots and nanorobots are quite promising and have been considerably reported in the orthodontic literature (13%, 9%). On the other hand, assistive robots, automated aligner production robots, and patient robots need more scientific data to be gathered in the future (1%, 1%, and 6%). Technological readiness of different robotic applications in orthodontics was further assessed. The presented eight domains of robotic technologies were assigned to an estimated technological readiness level according to the information given in the publications. Wire bending robots, TMD robots, nanorobots, and aligner production robots have reached the highest levels of technological readiness 9; diagnostic robots and patient robots reached level 7, whereas surgical robots and assistive robots reached lower levels of readiness 4 and 3, respectively.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthodontics / Robotics / Stomatognathic System Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2021

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthodontics / Robotics / Stomatognathic System Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2021