Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Airway pressure release ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study.
Zorbas, John S; Ho, Kwok M; Litton, Edward; Wibrow, Bradley; Fysh, Edward; Anstey, Matthew H.
  • Zorbas JS; Intensive Care Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Ho KM; Intensive Care Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Litton E; University of Western Australia School of Medicine, Perth, Australia.
  • Wibrow B; School of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
  • Fysh E; University of Western Australia School of Medicine, Perth, Australia.
  • Anstey MH; Intensive Care Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Acute Crit Care ; 36(2): 143-150, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1289166
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic suggested that, compared with conventional ventilation strategies, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) can improve oxygenation and reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to assess the association between APRV use and clinical outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 and hypothesized that APRV use would be associated with improved survival compared with conventional ventilation.

METHODS:

A total of 25 patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis was admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for invasive ventilation in Perth, Western Australia, between February and May 2020. Eleven of these patients received APRV. The primary outcome was survival to day 90. Secondary outcomes were ventilation-free survival days to day 90, mechanical complications from ventilation, and number of days ventilated.

RESULTS:

Patients who received APRV had a lower probability of survival than did those on other forms of ventilation (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.89; P=0.036). This finding was independent of indices of severity of illness to predict the use of APRV. Patients who received APRV also had fewer ventilator-free survival days up to 90 days after initiation of ventilation compared to patients who did not receive APRV, and survivors who received APRV had fewer ventilator-free days than survivors who received other forms of ventilation. There were no differences in mechanical complications according to mode of ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on the findings of this study, we urge caution with the use of APRV in COVID-19.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Acute Crit Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: ACC.2021.00017

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Acute Crit Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: ACC.2021.00017