Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Unruh, Lynn; Allin, Sara; Marchildon, Greg; Burke, Sara; Barry, Sarah; Siersbaek, Rikke; Thomas, Steve; Rajan, Selina; Koval, Andriy; Alexander, Mathew; Merkur, Sherry; Webb, Erin; Williams, Gemma A.
  • Unruh L; Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, 12494 University Blvd, Orlando, FL, USA. Electronic address: lynn.unruh@ucf.edu.
  • Allin S; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada. Electronic address: sara.allin@utoronto.ca.
  • Marchildon G; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada. Electronic address: greg.marchildon@utoronto.ca.
  • Burke S; Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: burkes17@tcd.ie.
  • Barry S; Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: barrys6@tcd.ie.
  • Siersbaek R; Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: rsiersba@tcd.ie.
  • Thomas S; Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: thomassd@tcd.ie.
  • Rajan S; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. Electronic address: Selina.rajan@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Koval A; Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, 12494 University Blvd, Orlando, FL, USA. Electronic address: Andriy.v.koval@ucf.edu.
  • Alexander M; Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23284, USA. Electronic address: alexandermv@mymail.vcu.edu.
  • Merkur S; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. Electronic address: s.m.merkur@lse.ac.uk.
  • Webb E; Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: e.webb@tu-berlin.de.
  • Williams GA; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. Electronic address: g.a.williams@lse.ac.uk.
Health Policy ; 126(5): 427-437, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293806
ABSTRACT
This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, which has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template completed by country experts. We show all countries faced common challenges during the pandemic, including difficulties in scaling-up testing capacity, implementing timely and appropriate containment measures amid much uncertainty and overcoming shortages of health and social care workers, personal protective equipment and other medical technologies. Country responses to address these issues were similar in many ways, but dissimilar in others, reflecting differences in health system organization and financing, political leadership and governance structures. In the US, lack of universal health coverage have created barriers to accessing care, while political pushback against scientific leadership has likely undermined the crisis response. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent messaging and alignment between health experts and political leadership to increase the level of compliance with public health measures, alongside the need to invest in health infrastructure and training and retaining an adequate domestic health workforce. Building on innovations in care delivery seen during the pandemic, including increased use of digital technology, can also help inform development of more resilient health systems longer-term.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Europa Language: English Journal: Health Policy Journal subject: Health Services Research / Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Europa Language: English Journal: Health Policy Journal subject: Health Services Research / Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article