Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Combined Effects of Masking and Distance on Aerosol Exposure Potential.
Tomshine, Jonathan R; Dennis, Kendall D; Bruhnke, Russell E; Christensen, James H; Halvorsen, Tom G; Hogan, Christopher J; O'Horo, John C; Breeher, Laura E; Callstrom, Matthew R; Wehde, Mark B.
  • Tomshine JR; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Dennis KD; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Bruhnke RE; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Christensen JH; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Halvorsen TG; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Hogan CJ; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  • O'Horo JC; Department of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Breeher LE; Department of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Callstrom MR; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Wehde MB; Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: mwehde@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(7): 1792-1800, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294049
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To quantify the efficacy of masking and "social distancing" on the transmission of airborne particles from a phantom aerosol source (simulating an infected individual) to a nearby target (simulating a healthy bystander) in a well-controlled setting.

METHODS:

An aerosol was created using monodisperse polystyrene latex beads in place of infectious respiratory secretions. Detection was by aerodynamic particle spectrometry. Both reusable cloth masks and disposable paper masks were studied. Transmission was simulated indoors during a 3-minute interval to eliminate the effect of variable ventilation rate on aerosol exposure. The study commenced on September 16, 2020, and concluded on December 15, 2020.

RESULTS:

Compared with a baseline of 1-foot separation with no masks employed, particle count was reduced by 84% at 3 feet of separation and 97% at 6 feet. A modest decrease in particle count was observed when only the receiver was masked. The most substantial exposure reduction occurred when the aerosol source was masked (or both parties were masked). When both the source and target were masked, particle count was reduced by more than 99.5% of baseline, regardless of separation distance or which type of mask was employed.

CONCLUSION:

These results support the principle of layered protection to mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, and other respiratory viruses and emphasize the importance of controlling the spread of aerosol at its source. The combination of masking and distancing reduced the exposure to exhaled particulates more than any individual measure. Combined measures remain the most effective way to combat the spread of respiratory infection.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aerosols / Physical Distancing / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.mayocp.2021.05.007

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aerosols / Physical Distancing / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.mayocp.2021.05.007