Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prioritizing cervical cancer screening services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Response of an academic medical center and a public safety net hospital in California.
Sawaya, George F; Holt, Hunter K; Lamar, Robyn; Perron-Burdick, Misa; Smith-McCune, Karen.
  • Sawaya GF; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America; Obstetrics, Midwifery and Gynecology Clinic, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, United States of America. Electronic address: George.Sawa
  • Holt HK; Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, United States of America.
  • Lamar R; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America.
  • Perron-Burdick M; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America; Obstetrics, Midwifery and Gynecology Clinic, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, United States of America.
  • Smith-McCune K; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America.
Prev Med ; 151: 106569, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294321
ABSTRACT
The expeditious diagnosis and treatment of high-grade cervical precancers are fundamental to cervical cancer prevention. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic healthcare systems have at times restricted in-person visits to those deemed urgent. Professional societies provided some guidance to clinicians regarding ways in which traditional cervical cancer screening might be modified, but many gaps remained. To address these gaps, leaders of screening programs at an academic medical center and an urban safety net hospital in California formed a rapid-action committee to provide guidance to its practitioners. Patients were divided into 6 categories corresponding to various stages in the screening process and ranked by risk of underlying high-grade cervical precancer and cancer. Tiers corresponding to the intensity of the local pandemic were constructed, and clinical delays were lengthened for the lowest-risk patients as tiers escalated. The final product was a management grid designed to escalate and de-escalate with changes in the local epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this effort resulted in substantial delays in clinical screening services as mandated by the healthcare systems, the population effects of delaying on both cervical cancer outcomes as well as the beneficial effects related to decreasing transmission of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 have yet to be elucidated.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prev Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prev Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article