Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinical evaluation of Sofia Rapid Antigen Assay for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among emergency department to hospital admissions.
Smith, Richard D; Johnson, J Kristie; Clay, Colleen; Girio-Herrera, Leo; Stevens, Diane; Abraham, Michael; Zimand, Paul; Ahlman, Mark; Gimigliano, Sheri; Zhao, Richard; Hildenbrand, Cynthia; Barrueto, Fermin; Leekha, Surbhi.
  • Smith RD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Johnson JK; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Clay C; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Girio-Herrera L; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Stevens D; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Abraham M; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Zimand P; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Ahlman M; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Gimigliano S; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Zhao R; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
  • Hildenbrand C; University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Barrueto F; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Leekha S; Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Bel Air, Maryland.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(8): 968-973, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294395
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the utility of the Sofia SARS rapid antigen fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) to guide hospital-bed placement of patients being admitted through the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional analysis of a clinical quality improvement study.

SETTING:

This study was conducted in 2 community hospitals in Maryland from September 21, 2020, to December 3, 2020. In total, 2,887 patients simultaneously received the Sofia SARS rapid antigen FIA and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays on admission through the ED.

METHODS:

Rapid antigen results and symptom assessment guided initial patient placement while confirmatory RT-PCR was pending. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the rapid antigen assay were calculated relative to RT-PCR, overall and separately for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Assay sensitivity was compared to RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. Assay turnaround times were compared. Clinical characteristics of RT-PCR-positive patients and potential exposures from false-negative antigen assays were evaluated.

RESULTS:

For all patients, overall agreement was 97.9%; sensitivity was 76.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-82%), and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI, 99%-100%). We detected no differences in performance between asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. As RT-PCR Ct increased, the sensitivity of the antigen assay decreased. The mean turnaround time for the antigen assay was 1.2 hours (95% CI, 1.0-1.3) and for RT-PCR it was 20.1 hours (95% CI, 18.9-40.3) (P < .001). No transmission from antigen-negative/RT-PCR-positive patients was identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although not a replacement for RT-PCR for detection of all SARS-CoV-2 infections, the Sofia SARS antigen FIA has clinical utility for potential initial timely patient placement.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article