Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Macro level influences on strategic responses to the COVID-19 pandemic - an international survey and tool for national assessments.
Ahmad, Raheelah; Atun, Rifat A; Birgand, Gabriel; Castro-Sánchez, Enrique; Charani, Esmita; Ferlie, Ewan B; Hussain, Izhar; Kambugu, Andrew; Labarca, Jaime; Hara, Gabriel Levy; McKee, Martin; Mendelson, Marc; Singh, Sanjeev; Varma, Jay; Zhu, Nina J; Zingg, Walter; Holmes, Alison H.
  • Ahmad R; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Atun RA; Division of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK.
  • Birgand G; Institute of Business & Health Management, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Castro-Sánchez E; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Charani E; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ferlie EB; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Hussain I; Centre d'Appui à la Prévention des Infections Associées aux Soins (CPias), Pays de la Loire, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Kambugu A; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Labarca J; Division of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK.
  • Hara GL; Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK.
  • McKee M; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Mendelson M; Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Singh S; Department of Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kerala, India.
  • Varma J; King's Business School, King's College London, Bush House, London, UK.
  • Zhu NJ; Institute of Business & Health Management, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Zingg W; Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Holmes AH; Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Glob Health ; 11: 05011, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1296176
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Variation in the approaches taken to contain the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic at country level has been shaped by economic and political considerations, technical capacity, and assumptions about public behaviours. To address the limited application of learning from previous pandemics, this study aimed to analyse perceived facilitators and inhibitors during the pandemic and to inform the development of an assessment tool for pandemic response planning.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional electronic survey of health and non-health care professionals (5 May - 5 June 2020) in six languages, with respondents recruited via email, social media and website posting. Participants were asked to score inhibitors (-10 to 0) or facilitators (0 to +10) impacting country response to COVID-19 from the following domains - Political, Economic, Sociological, Technological, Ecological, Legislative, and wider Industry (the PESTELI framework). Participants were then asked to explain their responses using free text. Descriptive and thematic analysis was followed by triangulation with the literature and expert validation to develop the assessment tool, which was then compared with four existing pandemic planning frameworks.

RESULTS:

928 respondents from 66 countries (57% health care professionals) participated. Political and economic influences were consistently perceived as powerful negative forces and technology as a facilitator across high- and low-income countries. The 103-item tool developed for guiding rapid situational assessment for pandemic planning is comprehensive when compared to existing tools and highlights the interconnectedness of the 7 domains.

CONCLUSIONS:

The tool developed and proposed addresses the problems associated with decision making in disciplinary silos and offers a means to refine future use of epidemic modelling.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Glob Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jogh.11.05011

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Glob Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jogh.11.05011