Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in real-life clinical settings.
Jegerlehner, Sabrina; Suter-Riniker, Franziska; Jent, Philipp; Bittel, Pascal; Nagler, Michael.
  • Jegerlehner S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Suter-Riniker F; Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Jent P; Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bittel P; Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Nagler M; University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: michael.nagler@insel.ch.
Int J Infect Dis ; 109: 118-122, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300809
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laboratory tests are a mainstay in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, and high hopes are placed on rapid antigen tests. However, the accuracy of rapid antigen tests in real-life clinical settings is unclear because adequately designed diagnostic accuracy studies are essentially lacking.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a rapid antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/secondary care testing facility.

METHODS:

Consecutive individuals presenting at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated to a Swiss University Hospital were recruited (n = 1465%). Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, and the Roche/SD Biosensor rapid antigen test was conducted in parallel with two real-time PCR tests (reference standard).

RESULTS:

Among the 1465 patients recruited, RT-PCR was positive in 141 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 9.6%. The Roche/SD Biosensor rapid antigen test was positive in 94 patients (6.4%), and negative in 1368 individuals (93.4%; insufficient sample material in 3 patients). The overall sensitivity of the rapid antigen test was 65.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.8-73.1), the specificity was 99.9% (95% CI 99.5-100.0). In asymptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was 44.0% (95% CI 24.4-65.1).

CONCLUSIONS:

The accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 Roche/SD Biosensor rapid antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections in a primary/secondary care testing facility was considerably lower compared with the manufacturer's data. Widespread application in such a setting might lead to a considerable number of individuals falsely classified as SARS-CoV-2 negative.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijid.2021.07.010

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijid.2021.07.010