Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study.
Fernández-Méndez, María; Otero-Agra, Martín; Fernández-Méndez, Felipe; Martínez-Isasi, Santiago; Santos-Folgar, Myriam; Barcala-Furelos, Roberto; Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio.
  • Fernández-Méndez M; CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Otero-Agra M; REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sports Science, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Fernández-Méndez F; Pontevedra School of Nursing, University of Vigo, 36004 Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Martínez-Isasi S; Santiago de Compostela's Health Research Institute (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Santos-Folgar M; REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sports Science, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Barcala-Furelos R; Pontevedra School of Nursing, University of Vigo, 36004 Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Núñez A; CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(13)2021 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1302314
ABSTRACT
The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for the self-protection of healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients at risk of aerosol transmission of infectious agents. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of personal protective equipment on physiological parameters during CPR. A randomized, quasi-experimental, crossover design was used. The study was carried out in a training and simulation emergency box and the total sample consisted of 20 healthcare professionals. Two CPR tests were compared with the recommended sequence of 30 chest compressions and 2 ventilations. The duration of each test was 20 min. One of the CPR tests was carried out without using any PPE (CPR_control), i.e., performed with the usual clothing of each rescuer. The other test was carried out using a CPR test with PPE (i.e., CPR_PPE). The main variables of interest were CPR quality, compressions, ventilations, maximum heart rate, body fluid loss, body temperature, perceived exertion index, comfort, thermal sensation and sweating. The quality of the CPR was similar in both tests. The maximum heart rate was higher in the active intervals (compressions + bag-valve-mask) of the test with PPE. CPR_PPE meant an increase in the perceived effort, temperature at the start of the thermal sensation test, thermal comfort and sweating, as opposed to CPR performed with usual clothing. Performing prolonged resuscitation with PPE did not influence CPR quality, but caused significant physiological demands. Rescuers were more fatigued, sweated more and their thermal comfort was worse. These results suggest that physical preparation should be taken into account when using PPE and protocols for physiological recovery after use should also be established.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Personal Protective Equipment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph18137093

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Personal Protective Equipment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph18137093