Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix for the closure of diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Lantis, John C; Snyder, Robert; Reyzelman, Alexander M; Van Gils, Carl C; Sigal, Felix; Vayser, Dean; Caporusso, Joseph M; Cazzell, Shawn; Lavery, Lawrence A.
  • Lantis JC; Mount Sinai West Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, US.
  • Snyder R; Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine, Miami, FL, US.
  • Reyzelman AM; Department of Medicine, California School of Podiatric Medicine and UCSF Center for Limb Preservation, California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, CA, US.
  • Van Gils CC; Foot & Ankle Institute, St. George, UT, US.
  • Sigal F; Foot and Ankle Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, US.
  • Vayser D; ILD Research Center, San Diego, CA, US.
  • Caporusso JM; Futuro Clinical Trials, McAllen, TX, US.
  • Cazzell S; Limb Preservation Platform, Valley Vascular Surgical Associates, Fresno, CA, US.
  • Lavery LA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, US.
J Wound Care ; 30(Sup7): S18-S27, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1310247
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix (FBADM) plus standard of care (SOC) for treating hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

METHOD:

A prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial was carried out. The study included a 2-week run-in period, a 12-week treatment phase and a 4-week follow-up phase. The primary endpoint was complete wound closure at 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

Twenty-one US sites enrolled and randomised 226 patients with hard-to-heal DFUs. The study was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of 207 patients, with 103 in the FBADM group and 104 in the SOC group. Of these participants, 161 completed the study per protocol (mPP population), with 79 receiving FBADM, and 82 without. At the first analysis point, patients treated with FBADM were found to be significantly more likely to achieve complete wound closure compared with SOC alone (mITT 45.6% versus 27.9% p=0.008; mPP 59.5% versus 35.6% p=0.002). The difference in outcome yielded an odds ratio of 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 3.9; p=0.008). Median time to closure within 12 weeks was 43 days for the FBADM group compared to 57 days for the SOC group (p=0.36). The median number of applications of FBADM to achieve closure was one. Adverse events were similar between groups and no product-related serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results indicate that in many cases a single application of FBADM in conjunction with SOC offers a safe, faster and more effective treatment of DFUs than SOC alone.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetic Foot / Diabetes Mellitus / Acellular Dermis / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Journal: J Wound Care Journal subject: Nursing Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S18

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetic Foot / Diabetes Mellitus / Acellular Dermis / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Journal: J Wound Care Journal subject: Nursing Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S18