Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and validation of the Oxford Pandemic Attitude Scale-COVID-19 (OPAS-C): an internet-based cross-sectional study in the UK and USA.
Kantor, Bella Nichole; Kantor, Jonathan.
  • Kantor BN; Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kantor J; Center for Global Health, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Florida Center for Dermatology, PA, St Augustine, Florida, USA jonkantor@gmail.com.
BMJ Open ; 11(7): e043758, 2021 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1311165
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To develop and validate the Oxford Pandemic Attitude Scale-COVID-19 (OPAS-C), a multidimensional scale that addresses seven domains over 20 items including stress, fear, loneliness, sense of community, belief that the pandemic is a hoax or exaggerated, the use of and attitude to non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccine hesitancy, in a single measure.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional validation study.

SETTING:

Internet based with respondents in the USA and UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

General community respondents using the Prolific Academic platform. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Exploratory factor analyses with promax oblique rotation and confirmatory factor analysis including goodness of fit indices root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardised root mean square residual (SRMR) and comparative fit index (CFI). Reliability as internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha. Convergent and discriminant validity using Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS:

The sample included 351 respondents in the USA and the factorial structure was confirmed using a separate set of 348 respondents in the UK. The OPAS-C had excellent goodness of fit characteristics, with an RMSEA of 0.047 (90% CI 0.037 to 0.056), SRMR of 0.043 and CFI of 0.962. Reliability was excellent, demonstrating Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 in both the US and UK samples. Convergent validity showed correlation coefficients of 0.54 and 0.49 in the US and UK samples, respectively. Discriminant validity demonstrated correlations of 0.21 and 0.26 in the US and UK samples, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The OPAS-C represents the first validated scale that addresses mental health measures and public health-relevant responses to COVID-19, and may be a useful measure for use in future longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. Further international validation beyond the USA and UK may be helpful.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-043758

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-043758