Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of automated antigen detection test for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Mak, Gannon C K; Lau, Stephen S Y; Wong, Kitty K Y; Chow, Nancy L S; Lau, C S; Ng, Ken H L; Lam, Edman T K; Chan, Rickjason C W; Tsang, Dominic N C.
  • Mak GCK; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China. Electronic address: so_phls10@dh.gov.hk.
  • Lau SSY; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wong KKY; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chow NLS; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lau CS; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ng KHL; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lam ETK; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan RCW; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
  • Tsang DNC; Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(4): 115490, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1313037
ABSTRACT
RT-PCR is the gold standard to detect SARS-CoV-2, however, its capacity is limited. We evaluated an automated antigen detection (AAD) test, Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Roche, Germany), for detecting SARS-CoV-2. We compared the limit of detection (LOD) between AAD test, rapid antigen detection (RAD) test; SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (SD Biosensor, Korea), and in-house RT-PCR test. LOD results showed that the AAD test was 100 fold more sensitive than the RAD test, while the sensitivity of the AAD test was comparable to the RT-PCR test. The AAD test detected between 85.7% and 88.6% of RT-PCR-positive specimens collected from COVID-19 patients, false negative results were observed for specimens with Ct values >30. Although clinical sensitivity for the AAD test was not superior or comparable to the RT-PCR test in the present study, the AAD test may be an alternative to RT-PCR test in terms of turn-around time and throughput.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2021 Document Type: Article