Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Pharmacist intervention on prescribing errors: Use of a standardized approach in the inpatient setting.
Cabri, Ann; Barsegyan, Naira; Postelnick, Michael; Schulz, Lucas; Nguyen, Victoria; Szwak, Jennifer; Shane, Rita.
  • Cabri A; Department of Pharmacy Services, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Barsegyan N; Department of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Postelnick M; Department of Pharmacy Services, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Schulz L; Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Nguyen V; Department of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Szwak J; Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Shane R; Department of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 78(23): 2151-2158, 2021 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317907
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The objective of this study was to implement a standardized process across health systems to determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of prescribing errors intercepted by pharmacists.

METHODS:

This prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted across 11 hospitals. Pharmacist-intercepted prescribing errors were collected during inpatient order verification over 6 consecutive weeks utilizing a standardized documentation process. The potential harm of each error was evaluated using a modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC-MERP) index with physician validation, and errors were stratified into those with potentially low, serious, or life-threatening harm. Endpoints included the median error rate per 1,000 patient days, error type, and potential harm with correlating cost avoidance.

RESULTS:

Pharmacists intervened on 7,187 errors, resulting in a mean error rate of 39 errors per 1,000 patient days. Among the errors, 46.6% (n = 3,349) were determined to have potentially serious consequences and 2.4% (n = 175) could have been life-threatening if not intercepted. This equates to $874,000 in avoided cost. The top 3 error types occurring with the highest frequency were "wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 2,298, 32.0%), "duplicate therapy" (n = 1,431, 19.9%), and "wrong timing" (n = 960, 13.4%). "Wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 49, 28%), "duplicate therapy" (n = 26, 14.9%), and "drug-disease interaction" (n = 24, 13.7%) errors occurred with the highest frequency among errors with potential for life-threatening harm. "Wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 1,028, 30.7%), "wrong timing" (n = 573, 17.1%), and "duplicate therapy" (n = 482, 14.4%) errors occurred with the highest frequency among errors with potentially serious harm.

CONCLUSION:

Documentation of pharmacist intervention on prescribing errors via a standardized process creates a platform for multicenter analysis of prescribing error trends and an opportunity for development of system-wide solutions to reduce potential harm from prescribing errors.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacists / Physicians / Medication Errors Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacists / Physicians / Medication Errors Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp