Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Reworking the post-covid waiting list-the patient experience of implantable loop recorder explantation
Heart ; 107(SUPPL 1):A81, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1325140
ABSTRACT
Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic has put a considerable strain on procedural waiting lists, with the majority of elective outpatient work cancelled during the pandemic. With the vaccination programme and reducing infection levels, attention is turning to addressing these waiting lists. One procedure that was affected was the removal of implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Manufacturers recommend that ILRs are removed at the point of battery depletion (usually 3-4 years), if they have not already been removed due to a positive finding or patient preference. There is little evidence in the literature regarding late complications with ILRs, and we therefore wished to examine what patients' thoughts would be about keeping the ILR in for a longer period of time. Methods Patients awaiting ILR explantation and those who had undergone explantation, were identified. A retrospective review of the notes was used to get demographic and clinical data. Both groups of patients were contacted, and a questionnaire used to gain an understanding of patients' experience and expectations. Results Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, 60 patients who had undergone ILR explantation were identified. A total of 22 responded to our questionnaire (table 1). The majority (86%) were happy to have their ILR removed, although a smaller majority (59%) would also have been happy to have had the device kept in, were it felt to be safe. Very few patients felt a tangible difference as a result of having the ILR removed (14%) and no patients were worried about the waiting time prior to Covid-19. Of 77 patients currently awaiting explant, 30 responded to our questionnaire (table 1), with 70% not being concerned by the wait for removal. This is likely aided by the fact that 80% of patients had no day to day symptoms as a result of the ILR. Half of the patients however, would be concerned about not having the ILR removed, predominantly due to mild discomfort or concerns regarding the presence of a battery. Across both groups (n=52) only 8 patients were concerned about the risk of coming into the hospital for the procedure, with patients commenting that the stringent regulations that hospitals had employed combined with the vaccination programme, gave them significant confidence in attending for outpatient procedures. Conclusions This study found that if patients are reassured about the safety of keeping an implantable loop recorder in, and do not suffer any discomfort or symptoms as a result of the device, they are happy both to wait longer for device removal, or even not have it removed at all. In the context of the current pandemic, more thought should perhaps be given to patient guided removal times, especially in cases of removals performed for battery depletion.

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Heart Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Heart Year: 2021 Document Type: Article