Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19.
Mittal, Niti; Mittal, Rakesh; Gupta, M C; Kaushal, Jyoti; Chugh, Ankita; Khera, Daisy; Singh, Surjit.
  • Mittal N; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
  • Mittal R; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
  • Gupta MC; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
  • Kaushal J; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
  • Chugh A; Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Khera D; Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Singh S; Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 10(6): 2126-2139, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1328185
ABSTRACT
Repurposed drugs like hydroxycloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are being tested for potential therapeutic role in COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of HCQ and CQ in COVID-19. Using PubMed, EMBASE, medRxiv, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, electronic search was carried out to identify relevant articles till June 2020 with re-evaluation in last week of November 2020. Observational and interventional clinical studies comparing efficacy of CQ or HCQ to standard management or other drug/s for SARS-CoV-2 infection patients were included. Cochrane review manager version 5.3 was used for synthesis of meta-analysis results. For randomized controlled trials, risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool, version 2.0 (ROB-2). ROBINS-I was used for quality assessment of observational studies. Overall evidence quality generated by review was graded as per GRADE Recommendation. A total of 903 studies were screened. Nineteen studies were included in synthesis of meta-analysis with total of 4,693, 1,626, and 6,491 patients in HCQ/CQ, HCQ/CQ + AZ and control groups, respectively. HCQ/CQ treatment was associated with significantly increased rates of virological cure (OR = 2.08, 95%CI = 1.36-3.17; P = 0.0007) and radiological cure (OR = 3.89, 95%CI = 1.35 - 11.23; P = 0.01) compared to control. HCQ/CQ had no difference in unadjusted mortality rate (unadjusted OR = 0.98 95% CI = 0.70-1.37, P = 0.89, random effect model) and adjusted hazard ratio for mortality (adjusted HR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.86--1.29; P = 0.64). However, a significant increase in odds of disease progression (OR = 1.77, 95%CI = 1.46-2.13; P < 0.00001) and QT prolongation (OR = 11.15, 95%CI = 3.95-31.44; P < 0.00001) was noted. The results with HCQ/CQ and azithromycin combination were similar to HCQ/CQ mono-therapy. In the light of contemporary evidence on effectiveness of HCQ/CQ, judicious and monitored use of HCQ/CQ for treatment of COVID-19 patients is recommended in low to middle income countries with emphasis on no mortality benefit. Registration number of Systematic review. Register in PROSPERO database cRD42020187710.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jfmpc.jfmpc_2338_20

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jfmpc.jfmpc_2338_20