Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: cross sectional study.
Schuit, Ewoud; Veldhuijzen, Irene K; Venekamp, Roderick P; van den Bijllaardt, Wouter; Pas, Suzan D; Lodder, Esther B; Molenkamp, Richard; GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H; Velzing, Jans; Huisman, Robin C; Brouwer, Lieke; Boelsums, Timo L; Sips, Gregorius J; Benschop, Kimberly S M; Hooft, Lotty; van de Wijgert, Janneke H H M; van den Hof, Susan; Moons, Karel G M.
  • Schuit E; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Veldhuijzen IK; Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Venekamp RP; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
  • van den Bijllaardt W; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Pas SD; Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
  • Lodder EB; Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
  • Molenkamp R; Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology. Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
  • GeurtsvanKessel CH; Public Health Service West-Brabant, Breda, Netherlands.
  • Velzing J; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Huisman RC; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Brouwer L; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Boelsums TL; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Sips GJ; Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Benschop KSM; Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Hooft L; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
  • van de Wijgert JHHM; Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • van den Hof S; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
  • Moons KGM; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
BMJ ; 374: n1676, 2021 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1329048
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the diagnostic test accuracy of two rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of people with SARS-CoV-2 infection on day 5 after exposure.

DESIGN:

Prospective cross sectional study.

SETTING:

Four public health service covid-19 test sites in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS:

4274 consecutively included close contacts (identified through test-and-trace programme or contact tracing app) aged 16 years or older and asymptomatic for covid-19 when requesting a test. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Veritor System (Beckton Dickinson) and Biosensor (Roche Diagnostics) rapid antigen tests, with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing as reference standard. The viral load cut-off above which 95% of people with a positive RT-PCR test result were virus culture positive was used as a proxy of infectiousness.

RESULTS:

Of 2678 participants tested with Veritor, 233 (8.7%) had a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection of whom 149 were also detected by the rapid antigen test (sensitivity 63.9%, 95% confidence interval 57.4% to 70.1%). Of 1596 participants tested with Biosensor, 132 (8.3%) had a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection of whom 83 were detected by the rapid antigen test (sensitivity 62.9%, 54.0% to 71.1%). In those who were still asymptomatic at the time of sampling, sensitivity was 58.7% (51.1% to 66.0%) for Veritor (n=2317) and 59.4% (49.2% to 69.1%) for Biosensor (n=1414), and in those who developed symptoms were 84.2% (68.7% to 94.0%; n=219) for Veritor and 73.3% (54.1% to 87.7%; n=158) for Biosensor. When a viral load cut-off was applied for infectiouness (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E gene copies/mL), the overall sensitivity was 90.1% (84.2% to 94.4%) for Veritor and 86.8% (78.1% to 93.0%) for Biosensor, and 88.1% (80.5% to 93.5%) for Veritor and 85.1% (74.3% to 92.6%) for Biosensor, among those who remained asymptomatic throughout. Specificities were >99%, and positive and negative predictive values were >90% and >95%, for both rapid antigen tests in all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

The sensitivities of both rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts tested on day 5 onwards after close contact with an index case were more than 60%, increasing to more than 85% after a viral load cut-off was applied as a proxy for infectiousness.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: BMJ Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmj.n1676

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: BMJ Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmj.n1676