Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.
Aiken, Ara; Lohr, P A; Lord, J; Ghosh, N; Starling, J.
  • Aiken A; LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Lohr PA; British Pregnancy Advisory Service, Stratford upon Avon, UK.
  • Lord J; MSI Reproductive Choices, London, UK.
  • Ghosh N; National Unplanned Pregnancy Advisory Service (NUPAS), Birmingham, UK.
  • Starling J; Mathematica Policy Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
BJOG ; 128(9): 1464-1474, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1337350
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare outcomes before and after implementation of medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) without ultrasound via telemedicine.

DESIGN:

Cohort analysis.

SETTING:

The three main abortion providers. POPULATION OR SAMPLE Medical abortions at home at ≤69 days' gestation in two cohorts traditional model (in-person with ultrasound, n = 22 158) from January to March 2020 versus telemedicine-hybrid model (either in person or via telemedicine without ultrasound, n = 29 984, of whom 18 435 had no-test telemedicine) between April and June 2020. Sample (n = 52 142) comprises 85% of all medical abortions provided nationally.

METHODS:

Data from electronic records and incident databases were used to compare outcomes between cohorts, adjusted for baseline differences. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Treatment success, serious adverse events, waiting times, gestation at treatment, acceptability.

RESULTS:

Mean waiting time from referral to treatment was 4.2 days shorter in the telemedicine-hybrid model and more abortions were provided at ≤6 weeks' gestation (40% versus 25%, P < 0.001). Treatment success (98.8% versus 98.2%, P > 0.999), serious adverse events (0.02% versus 0.04%, P = 0.557) and incidence of ectopic pregnancy (0.2% versus 0.2%, P = 0.796) were not different between models. In the telemedicine-hybrid model, 0.04% were estimated to be over 10 weeks' gestation at the time of the abortion; all were completed safely at home. Within the telemedicine-hybrid model, effectiveness was higher with telemedicine than in-person care (99.2% versus 98.1%, P < 0.001). Acceptability of telemedicine was high (96% satisfied) and 80% reported a future preference for telemedicine.

CONCLUSIONS:

A telemedicine-hybrid model for medical abortion that includes no-test telemedicine and treatment without an ultrasound is effective, safe, acceptable and improves access to care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Compelling evidence from 52 142 women shows no-test telemedicine abortion is safe, effective and improves care.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Induced / Telemedicine Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BJOG Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 1471-0528.16668

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Induced / Telemedicine Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BJOG Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 1471-0528.16668