Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review.
Probst, Livia Fernandes; Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes; Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz; Grande, Antonio Jose; Croda, Mariana Garcia; Venturini, James; Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo; Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone.
  • Probst LF; Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Guerrero ATG; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cardoso AIQ; Institute of Technology in Immunobiologicals: Bio-Manguinhos. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Grande AJ; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • Croda MG; Faculty of Medicine , State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • Venturini J; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • Fonseca MCC; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • Paniago AMM; State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil.
  • Barreto JOM; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • de Oliveira SMDVL; Fiocruz School of Government Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil. jorgeomaia@hotmail.com.
Syst Rev ; 10(1): 219, 2021 08 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1342825
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols.

METHODS:

We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter.

RESULTS:

A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Equipment Reuse / COVID-19 Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-021-01742-1

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Equipment Reuse / COVID-19 Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-021-01742-1