Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Multicentre Performance Evaluation of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay as an Aid in Determining Previous Exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Riester, Elena; Majchrzak, Mario; Mühlbacher, Annelies; Tinguely, Caroline; Findeisen, Peter; Hegel, Johannes Kolja; Laimighofer, Michael; Rank, Christopher M; Schönfeld, Kathrin; Langen, Florina; Laengin, Tina; Niederhauser, Christoph.
  • Riester E; Labor Augsburg MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Majchrzak M; German Red Cross Blood Service West GmbH, Central Laboratory Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
  • Mühlbacher A; Central Institute of Blood Transfusion and Immunology (ZIB), University Hospital LKH, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Tinguely C; Interregionale Blood Transfusion Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Findeisen P; MVZ Labor Limbach, Im Breitspiel 16, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. peter.findeisen@labor-limbach.de.
  • Hegel JK; Labor Berlin, Charité Vivantes Services GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Laimighofer M; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Rank CM; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Schönfeld K; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Langen F; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Laengin T; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Niederhauser C; Interregionale Blood Transfusion Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland.
Infect Dis Ther ; 10(4): 2381-2397, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1347447
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We performed a multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics), an assay utilising a recombinant protein representing the nucleocapsid (N) antigen, for the in vitro qualitative detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

METHODS:

Specificity was evaluated using serum/plasma samples from blood donors and routine diagnostic specimens collected before September 2019 (i.e., presumed negative for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies); sensitivity was evaluated using samples from patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Method comparison was performed versus commercially available assays.

RESULTS:

Overall specificity for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (n = 9575) was 99.85% (95% CI 99.75-99.92) blood donors (n = 6714; 99.82%), routine diagnostic specimens (n = 2861; 99.93%), pregnant women (n = 2256; 99.91%), paediatric samples (n = 205; 100.00%). The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay demonstrated significantly higher specificity versus LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (99.71% vs. 98.48%), EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% vs. 94.87%), ADVIA Centaur SARS-CoV-2 Total (100.00% vs. 87.32%) and iFlash SARS-CoV-2 IgM (100.00% vs. 99.58%) assays, and comparable specificity to ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (99.75% vs. 99.65%) and iFlash SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% vs. 100.00%) assays. Overall sensitivity for Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay samples drawn at least 14 days post-PCR confirmation (n = 219) was 93.61% (95% CI 89.51-96.46). No statistically significant differences in sensitivity were observed between the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay versus EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (90.32% vs. 95.16%) and ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (84.81% vs. 87.34%) assays. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay showed significantly lower sensitivity versus ADVIA Centaur SARS-CoV-2 Total (85.19% vs. 95.06%) and iFlash SARS-CoV-2 IgG (86.25% vs. 93.75%) assays, but significantly higher sensitivity versus the iFlash SARS-CoV-2 IgM assay (86.25% vs. 33.75%).

CONCLUSION:

The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay demonstrated very high specificity and high sensitivity in samples collected at least 14 days post-PCR confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, supporting its use to aid in determination of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Infect Dis Ther Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40121-021-00504-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Infect Dis Ther Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40121-021-00504-9