Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Observations and Considerations for Implementing Remote Acoustic Voice Recording and Analysis in Clinical Practice.
Schneider, Sarah L; Habich, Laura; Weston, Zoe M; Rosen, Clark A.
  • Schneider SL; UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: sarah.schneider@ucsf.edu.
  • Habich L; UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Weston ZM; UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Rosen CA; UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Voice ; 2021 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1347736
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/

HYPOTHESIS:

Remote voice recording and acoustic analysis allow for comprehensive voice assessment and outcome tracking without the requirements of travel to the clinic, in-person visit, or expensive equipment. This paper delineates the process and considerations for implementing remote voice recording and acoustic analysis in a high-volume university voice clinic. STUDY

DESIGN:

Clinical Focus.

METHODS:

Acoustic voice recordings were attempted on 108 unique patients over a 6-month period using a remote voice recording phone application. Development of the clinical process including determining normative data in which to compare acoustic results, clinician training, and clinical application is described. The treating Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) were surveyed 2 months after implementation to assess ease of application, identify challenges and assess implementation of potential solutions.

RESULTS:

Of 108 unique patients, 83 patients were successful in completing the process of synchronous remote acoustic voice recording in conjunction with their SLP clinician. The process of downloading the application, setting up, and obtaining voice recordings was most commonly 10-20 minutes according to the 8 SLPs surveyed. Challenges and helpful techniques were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

Remote acoustic voice recordings have allowed SLPs to continue to complete a comprehensive voice evaluation in a telepractice model. Given emerging knowledge about the viability of remote voice recordings, the success in obtaining acoustic data remotely, and the accessibility of a low-cost app for SLPs makes remote voice recordings a viable option to facilitate remote clinical care and research investigation.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article