Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Co-infections observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients using a rapid diagnostic test.
Fontana, Carla; Favaro, Marco; Minelli, Silvia; Bossa, Maria Cristina; Altieri, Anna.
  • Fontana C; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. carla.fontana@uniroma2.it.
  • Favaro M; Microbiology and Virology Lab, Tor Vergata University Hospital, V.le Oxford, 81 00133, Rome, Italy. carla.fontana@uniroma2.it.
  • Minelli S; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Bossa MC; Microbiology and Virology Lab, Tor Vergata University Hospital, V.le Oxford, 81 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Altieri A; Microbiology and Virology Lab, Tor Vergata University Hospital, V.le Oxford, 81 00133, Rome, Italy.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 16355, 2021 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1354115
ABSTRACT
Rapid diagnostic tests are tools of paramount impact both for improving patient care and in antimicrobial management programs. Particularly in the case of respiratory infections, it is of great importance to quickly confirm/exclude the involvement of pathogens, be they bacteria or viruses, while obtaining information about the presence/absence of a genetic target of resistance to modulate antibiotic therapy. In this paper, we present our experiences with the use of the Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel Plus (FAPP; bioMérieux; Marcy l'Etoile, France) to assess coinfection in COVID-19 patients. A total of 152 respiratory samples from consecutive patients were examined, and 93 (61%) were found to be FAPP positive, with the detection of bacteria and/or viruses. The patients were 93 males and 59 females with an average age of 65 years who were admitted to our hospital due to moderate/severe acute respiratory symptoms. Among the positive samples were 52 from sputum (SPU) and 41 from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The most representative species was S. aureus (most isolates were mecA positive; 30/44, 62%), followed by gram-negative pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii. Evidence of a virus was rare. Cultures performed from BAL and SPU samples gave poor results. Most of the discrepant negative cultures were those in which FAPP detected pathogens with a microbial count ≤ 105 CFU/mL. H. influenzae was one of the most common pathogens lost by the conventional method. Despite the potential limitations of FAPP, which detects a defined number of pathogens, its advantages of rapid detection combined with predictive information regarding the antimicrobial resistance of pathogens through the detection of some relevant markers of resistance could be very useful for establishing empirical targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with respiratory failure. In the COVID era, we understand the importance of using antibiotics wisely to curb the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Tract Infections / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Coinfection / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-95772-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Tract Infections / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Coinfection / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-95772-3