Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A novel epidemiological scoring system for the prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Mishra, Prabhaker; Singh, Ratender Kumar; Nath, Alok; Pande, Shantanu; Agarwal, Anil; Sanjeev, Om Prakash; Gupta, Devendra; Singh, Prateek; Ghatak, Tanmoy; Hashim, Zia; Khare, Vansh; Khuba, Sandeep; Rastogi, Amit; Dhiman, Radha K.
  • Mishra P; Biostatistics and Health Informatics.
  • Singh RK; Emergency Medicine.
  • Nath A; Pulmonary Medicine.
  • Pande S; Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.
  • Agarwal A; Anaesthesiology.
  • Sanjeev OP; Emergency Medicine.
  • Gupta D; Anaesthesiology.
  • Singh P; Anaesthesiology.
  • Ghatak T; Emergency Medicine.
  • Hashim Z; Pulmonary Medicine.
  • Khare V; Anaesthesiology.
  • Khuba S; Anaesthesiology.
  • Rastogi A; Anaesthesiology.
  • Dhiman RK; Hepatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow-226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 116(5): 409-416, 2022 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356713
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Most of the reported risk score models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality are based on the levels of inflammatory markers, comorbidities or various treatment modalities, and there is a paucity of risk score models based on clinical symptoms and comorbidities.

METHODS:

To address this need, age, clinical symptoms and comorbidities were used to develop a COVID-19 scoring system (CSS) for early prediction of mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. The CSS was developed with scores ranging from 0 to 9. A higher score indicates higher risk with good discrimination quality presented by Mann Whitney U test and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS:

Patient age of ≥60 y, cough, breathlessness, diabetes and any other comorbidity (with or without diabetes) are significant and independent risk factors for non-survival among COVID-19 patients. The CSS showed good sensitivity and specificity (i.e. 74.1% and 78.5% at CSS≥5, respectively), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82.8%, which was close to the diagnostic accuracy detected in the validation cohort (81.9%). In the validation cohort, high (8-9), medium (5-7) and low (0-4) CSS groups had 54.80%, 28.60% and 6.5% observed mortality, respectively, which was very close to the predicted mortality (62.40%, 27.60% and 5.2%, respectively, by scoring cohort).

CONCLUSIONS:

The CSS shows a positive relationship between a higher score and proportion of mortality and, as its validation showed, it is useful for the prediction of risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients at an early stage, so that referral for triage and admission can be predetermined even before admission to hospital.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article